February Newsletter -- Getting results: FCC now considering proposal that would actually protect the Open Internet.

In this months newsletter:

The FCC's proposal to reclassify the Internet under Title II is a big win for the Open Internet!
Recently, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler proposed reclassifation of the internet as a Title II communications service.  If adopted February 26, the proposal would give the FCC the legal authority it needs to preserve and protect the Open Internet. Executive Director Art Neill sat down with KPBS to discuss why the Federal Communication Commission's new Open Internet rules are necessary to ensure a free and open internet




For more on the Net Neutrality debate and what it means for you, check out our latest blog post on Net Neutrality here.
 


New Media Rights files critical comments in anti-circumvention proceedings to protect internet users and creators' rights.
New Media Rights has filed comments with the Copyright Office supporting four specific exemptions to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s anti-circumvention provisions that will protect both internet users and creators' rights under fair use. Exemptions are argued every 3 years, and ensure that accessing copyrighted material for purposes of fair use don't needlessly violate federal law.

Similar to our 2009 and 2012 comments to the Copyright Office, these comments offer direct evidence supporting the right of internet users and video creators to circumvent technological protection measures to a) allow individuals to take control of the apps and services they use on their mobile devices, and b) allow creators, internet users, and filmmakers to reuse video content for fair use purposes.  Thanks to our legal intern California Western School of Law 2L Pat McManus for his assistance in preparing these comments. You can read more here.


NMR in the news


Upcoming events

"Print Me a Song: Emerging Issues in 3D Printing and Copyright Law"Staff Attorney, Teri Karobonik, will be giving a presentation to the San Diego Sports and Entertainment Lawyers February 26 at 6pm about emerging issues in copyright. In addition to covering some of the basics she’ll cover emerging issues in 3D printing like singing printers, fan works and even #LeftShark . More info here.

“Copyright, Trademark, and Branding IP”Executive Director Art Neill will be giving a presentation from February 26 at 5:30 (yes the same day as the event above), on the basics of Copyright and Trademark that tech entrepreneurs need to know.  This is a free event, targeted at entrepreneurs and creators and if you’re interested in attending, you can find more info here.
 


All the best,

Art Neill, Teri Karobonik, and the New Media Rights team

Value legal services for internet users and creators?  Support them.

Topics: 

Content Types: 

Why the FCC's proposal to reclassify the Internet under Title II is a big win for the Open Internet

Updated February 26, 2015

After a decade of debate, the 3-2 vote February 26, 2015 at the Federal Communications Commission to reclassify the Internet under Title is a win for the consumers, creators, and innovators that rely on the create and share their ideas. We'll continue to be involved in working to preserve the open Internet, but today is a great moment to say congratulations to the millions of individuals and organizations who made this possible.  You can see our post analyzing the impact of implementing Title II below.

Analysis

Recently, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler proposed reclassifation of the internet as a Title II communications service.  The move gives the FCC the legal authority it needs to preserve and protect and preserve the Open Internet.

This is a good thing.  Here's a TV interview we did explaining what's going on.

KUSI News - San Diego, CA

You can also listen to a more in depth interview here.

Without this reclassification we face the trade-off of improved profits for already hugely profitable companies, in exchange for the internet as we know it. This trade-off is unacceptable to the creators and consumers we serve.

The nature of the internet as an open, accessible network has allowed individuals and businesses to create technologies and services that have transformed our world.  It also has allowed individuals and organizations to speak and communicate with audiences in unprecedented ways. 

What this is, how we got here

Last year right around this time we were in the wake of a big court decision against the FCC, Verizon v FCC.  The result of that decision was that the FCC had little if any authority to ensure that the internet remains a level playing field, and make sure consumers can continue to access content and services of their choice.  It paved the way for potential cableization of the internet, where you might have different tiers of content, rather than a simple platform where anyone and everyone could compete. You might have fast lanes, and preferred services, and slowly but surely the internet we know would disappear, in favor of providing a bit more profit to already very profitable Cable and Wireless companies.

What are the key provisions?

The key provisions of the Title II reclassification proposal help to avoid Internet Access Providers abusing their position as Gatekeepers. Here's a fact sheet the FCC recently released on the proposal.  While we're awaiting the precise language of the proposal, here's our take on the proposal from what's been released so far.

No blocking - broadband providers can't block access to to legal content, applications, services, and nonharmful devices
No Throttling - broadband providers may not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices.
No Paid Prioritization: broadband providers may not favor some lawful Internet traffic overother lawful traffic in exchange for consideration – in other words, no “fast lanes.” This rule also bans ISPs from prioritizing content and services of their affiliates.

Avoids Pay to Play - where established services can simply keep out competitors by paying for fast lanes to consumers.
Transparency - says broadband providers need to be transparent about their practices

Extends all of this to Wireless - This is big, and also exceedinly reasonable.  55%+ web traffic is wireless now, and previous rules created a dual structure where cable / fiber was treated differently than mobile broadband.

ONE BIG CAVEAT  - Broadband providers can engage in reasonable network management.  This makes sense, the specifics of what is reasonable will likely be sorted out through proceedings at the FCC and in court.  This is medium specific, so what's acceptable in terms of network management for fiber, cable, wireless, are different.  However, the FCC seems to aim to keep this exception narrow, because broadband providers must truly be acting for reasonable network management reasons, NOT for commercial reasons.   

Key outstanding questions

1. How this will apply to zero rating situations, such as T-mobile's badly named "music freedom" program?  Zero rating is where broadband providers can exempt preferred services from data caps.  We think this will violate the new rules, but it is an issue that is front and center with the new rules.

2. Potential revamping of Title II?  The FCC's fact sheet does reference a potential rework or modernization of Title II. Reclassification could lose its teeth if any of these changes include diminishing Title II's grant of authority to the FCC to ensure net neutrality.

Going forward

Large broadband providers will resist reclassfication, but the public overwhelmingly supports the principles of net neutrality that reclassification enables the FCC to protect.  It is as important as ever for internet users and organizations to stay vigilant, and make themselves heard, to ensure the FCC preserves the Open Internet 

Value legal services for internet users and creators?  Support them.

Topics: 

Content Types: 

Tags: 

The Internet is counting on you Senator Wyden

On January 27, 2015, New Media Rights, along with 6 other organizations and 7,550 concerned Internet users, signed a letter calling on Senator Wyden for his assistance opposing the renewal of “Fast Track" authority [also known as Trade Promotion Authority or TPA].

Particularly, this letter urges Sen. Wyden to stand up to the recently proposed Fast Track bill.  If this bill passed and Fast Track were renewed, Congress would lose its power over trade policy. That power would go directly into the hands of the White House. This would deny Congress the opportunity to review and amend treaties negotiated entirely in secret like the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement and the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).This lack of meaningful review could lead to more extreme regulations which threaten Internet freedom and many of the efforts to reform Intellectual property law in the US. 

As a Ranking Member of the Senate Finance Committee Sen. Wyden has significant influence on the future of FastTrack. And as a long-time defender of digital rights and outspoken critic of the TTP, it is critical Sen. Wyden knows that once again we need his support. The letter concludes:

Users urge you to stand strong and oppose any new version of trade authority that does not include these critical guarantees of transparency, inclusiveness and accountability…


We are counting on you, as a pioneer in the digital rights movement, to oppose any TPA bill that does not truly address these troubling procedural issues.


Please do not support TPA. The Internet is counting on you.


The coalition of 7 public interest groups signing onto the letter include: Creative Commons, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Internet Archive, Knowledge Ecology International New Media Rights, Open Media International, Public Knowledge. The full text of the letter is attached to this post.

AttachmentSize
Publicletter-Wyden-TPA-EFF-fnl.pdf138.04 KB

Value legal services for internet users and creators?  Support them.

Content Types: 

New Media Rights files comments at the Copyright Office supporting the right to jailbreak mobile devices and lawfully reuse video content

New Media Rights has filed comments with the Copyright Office supporting four specific exemptions to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s anti-circumvention provisions that will protect both internet users and creators' rights under fair use. Exemptions are argued every 3 years, and ensure that accessing copyrighted material for purposes of fair use don't needlessly violate federal law.

Similar to our 2009 and 2012 comments to the Copyright Office, these comments offer direct evidence supporting the right of internet users and video creators to circumvent technological protection measures to a) allow individuals to take control of the apps and services they use on their mobile devices, and b) allow creators, internet users, and filmmakers to reuse video content for fair use purposes. Thanks to our legal intern California Western School of Law 2L Pat McManus for his assistance in preparing these comments.

Download a full copy of this paper from SSRN.

What’s new or different in these comments?

Our 2015 comments also argue that these exemptions should be extended to include additional devices and technologies.  We argue that jailbreaking should apply to tablets just as it does to smartphones (as we did in 2012), and that bypassing anti-circumvention technology should include non-DVD sources, such as Blu-ray discs and online sources.  Our 2015 comments on anti-circumvention also provide direct evidence of filmmakers that depend on the ability to bypass anti-circumvention technology.

Broader problems with the 1201 process

In addition to supporting specific classes of exemptions with direct evidence from clients we serve, New Media Rights also encourages the Copyright Office to explore ways to ensure broader exemption of all otherwise lawful activities.  One thing remains constant in the DMCA Anti-Circumvention exemption proceedings: an enormous output of time and energy by legal clinics, nonprofits, and others every three years in pursuit of broad range of worthy, but narrow exemptions.  The commonality in the arguments made for the exemptions is that the circumvention should be exempted from violating federal law under the Anti-Circumvention provisions because the uses targeted are not otherwise unlawful.  We maintain that an elegant way to improve the provisions, and allow otherwise lawful uses without requiring such a tremendous use of resources, is to simply exempt all uses that are otherwise lawful.  Specifically, if a use is deemed a fair use, anti-circumvention should simply not be applicable to the use, and should not be available as a cause of action.

NMR requests that the Copyright Office look systematically to  find ways, either through regulation or proposed legislation, to provide broad exemptions to the anti-circumvention provisions that protect otherwise lawful uses of content such as uses made in fair use.
An exemption or exception that allowed for circumvention of technological protection measures (TPMs) for any reuse that falls under fair use would be very efficient because there would be a stable rule of law that does not change every three years.  Such a broader exemption would also provide certainty because people would know that they could circumvent TPMs for reuse as long as their reuse constituted fair use; those people would not have to determine if they were included in one of many narrow classes of exemptions.  Video creators, for example, would know that circumvention of TPMs is legal as long as the resulting video falls under fair use. Video creators would not have to wait three years to determine whether certain activity is legal, and whether their particular use is the type excused by narrow exemptions.  Instead, they would know what type of conduct is permitted, and permitted conduct would not be subject to change over time. As long as one circumvents TPMs for a noninfringing purpose, such as fair use, the circumvention should be legal. A broader exemption would ensure that anti-circumvention don’t needlessly include people who have otherwise not violated the law.

The Proposed Exemptions

The proposed specific exemptions provide a safety valve for otherwise lawful behavior by consumers and creators. Specifically, NMR’s comments relate to Proposed Classes 6, 7, 16, and 17 as requested by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the International Documentary Association, respectively. 

Proposed Class 6: Allowing Documentary Filmmakers to Reuse Footage from Motion Pictures for Commercial Purposes

Proposed Class 6 would allow circumvention of encryption technology on DVDs and Blu-ray discs, as well as technology that shields content on online sources.  This exemption is important so that documentary filmmakers can bypass anti-circumvention technology to access high quality content for fair use purposes. Our comment argues that these filmmakers should not be excluded from the exemption simply because they profit from their work. Our comment includes the stories of filmmakers who represent a wide array of social and cultural commentary that this exemption would protect.

Proposed Class 7: Accessing videos to reuse footage from DVDs, Blu-ray discs, and online sources

Proposed Class 7 would allow circumvention of encryption technology on DVDs and Blu-ray discs, as well as technology that shields content on online sources.  This exemption is meant to allow creators, remixers, and vidders the ability to bypass DVD encryption technology to obtain high quality footage for the videos they create.  The exemption only extends to creators who engage in fair use and thus allows those creators to defend themselves under fair use.  Our comment includes the stories of creators who represent the wide array of social, political, and cultural commentary that this exemption would protect.

Proposed Class 16: Jailbreaking of Smartphones

Proposed Class 16 would renew the exemption for jailbreaking smartphones.  Jailbreaking is essential to ensure competition and innovation.  Jailbreaking also provides a safety valve to censorship by OS makers, wireless carriers, and device manufacturers who use their power to control what apps the public can access. Jailbreaking also allows consumers to customize their smartphones and address security and privacy concerns without having to wait for the OS maker to provide relief.

Proposed Class 17: Jailbreaking of Tablets

Proposed Class 17 would extend Class 16’s exemption to tablets.  As addressed above, Jailbreaking is useful to consumers, and ensures competition and innovation.  Our comment focuses on the similarities between smartphones and tablets.  We provide evidence that shows that smartphones and tablets are converging to the point where they are aesthetically and functionally indistinguishable.  We therefore argue that due to the similarities between smartphones and tablets, the exemption should be extended to tablets as well as smartphones.

Value legal services for internet users and creators?  Support them.

Topics: 

Content Types: 

The top 5 things New Media Rights thinks you should know about the public domain.

At New Media Rights we work to make the public domain more accessible. In celebration of copyright week here are the top five things you need to know about the public domain.

5. No new works will fall into the public domain in the US until 2019.

Due to extensions in US copyright law back in the 60’s and 70’s no new works will enter the public domain in the US until 2019. Notice we say the US here. In countries where the copyright term is life plus 70 years (such as Brazil and EU members) and life plus 50 (including Canada and New Zealand) works did fall into the public domain this year including  great works like The Little Prince and the classic painting “The Scream”.

4. Finding out if some works are in the public domain in the US may still cost you.

Works created between 1923 and 1964 fall into a grey area; they may be in the public domain depending on if their copyright was renewed 28 years from the date of the original copyright. Unfortunately, finding that renewal record will probably cost you. The only official records of renewal are held by the Copyright Office in Washington D.C.  Since, records before January 1, 1978 are not available online; the only way to gain access to these accurate and official records of copyright renewals is to either:

  1. Go to the Copyright office in person, in Washington D.C., and research their records using paper card catalogs OR;
  2. Pay the copyright office $200 an hour to search the copyright records for the original copyright and the renewal notice.

While the copyright office is actively seeking to digitize these records and make them searchable, given the budget cuts the office has faced in the past few years this will likely be a lengthy process.

3. Finding out what is in the public domain doesn’t always have to be hard.

New Media Rights has great guides to help you figure out when something falls into the public domain. We also have a guide that will help you find public domain and openly licensed works to use in your own creative works. We also have several YouTube videos that help answer commonly asked questions about the public domain.

2. You can put your work into the public domain.

Not sure you want your great grandchildren fighting over the rights to your independent film? Maybe you think your research would do more good to the world if folks could do whatever they wanted to do with it? Or maybe you’re worried about your work falling into obscurity? 

Although in the US copyright is granted from the moment of fixation, you can affirmatively put your work in the public domain for free! Although there a few different options for putting your work in the public domain, using the Creative Commons Public Domain Designation is one of the more straightforward ways and you can learn more about that option here!

1. Still have a question about the public domain? That’s what we’re here for!

If you have a question about the public domain you can contact us via our contact form here. You can also sign on to support Copyright Week’s four principles, including the importance of building a robust public domain, through the EFF here.


 

Value legal services for internet users and creators?  Support them.

Topics: 

Content Types: 

New Media Rights to file comments supporting key Anti-Circumvention exemptions

We're taking part in Copyright Week, a series of actions and discussions supporting key principles that should guide copyright policy. Every day this week, various groups are taking on different elements of the law, and addressing what's at stake, and what we need to do to make sure that copyright promotes creativity and innovation. Today's theme is "Owners Rights" and the upcoming Copyright Anti-Circumvention Exemption Proceeding.

Comments to the Copyright Office's current Anti-Circumvention exemption proceeding are due February 6, 2015.  As in past years (2012, 2009), New Media Rights will be offering direct evidence of the creators and consumers we work with who rely on these exemptions.  Here's a brief preview of our comment.

One thing remains constant in the DMCA Anti-Circumvention exemption proceedings: an enormous output of time and energy by legal clinics, nonprofits, and others every three years in pursuit of broad range of worthy, but narrow exemptions.  Most of these exemptions discuss why a particular use is not otherwise illegal, and should be exempted from violating federal law under the Anti-Circumvention provisions.  We maintain that an elegant way to improve the provisions, and allow otherwise lawful uses without requiring such a tremendous use of resources, is to simply exempt all uses that are otherwise lawful.

In this proceeding we will be specifically arguing for the right of a) remix creators and filmmakers to circumvent technological protection measures to reuse video in fair use, as well as b) the right of  individuals to take control of the apps and services they use on their mobile devices.

Our 2015 comment will support expansions of these recommendations in important ways - including arguing that jailbreaking should also apply to tablets and that the bypassing of anti-circumvention technology should include Blu-Ray, as well as DVD and online sources.

Jailbreaking of smartphones and tablets

Jailbreaking is essential to ensure competition and innovation.  Jailbreaking enables alternative app marketplaces, which provide a safety valve to censorship by OS makers, wireless carriers, and device manufacturers, who use their gatekeeping power to control what apps and services we can access.  In addition, jailbreaking allows for increased customization that allows consumers to address security and privacy concerns instead of being forced to wait for the OS maker to address the issues.  These exemptions would allow consumers to continue to enjoy the benefits of jaibreaking their smartphones to lawful software, and extend these benefits to tablets. 

Accessing video to reuse footage from Blu-Ray, DVDs and online sources

This exemption is meant to allow creators, remixers, and vidders the ability to bypass DVD encryption technology to obtain high quality footage for the videos they create.  The exemption extends only to videos that fall within the bounds of fair use and thus, this exemption is not as broad as many copyright holders argue.  This exemption allows those who create and share videos that reuse existing content to defend themselves under fair use.  Our comment includes the stories of creators who represent the wide array of social, political, and cultural commentary that this exemption would protect.

We also argue that it is necessary to allow circumvention to provide access to higher quality footage, which is both demanded by viewers and necessary to communicate a creator’s message.  Many of the already legal methods to obtain the footage – including screen capture or analog capturing – are deficient. 

As more content becomes available solely online, it becomes more important for internet users and creators to be able to lawfully repurpose and reuse this source of material.  There is an enormous amount of content not currently available on DVD.  To ensure the basic right to post videos regarding current social events or hotly debated political topics, it is essential allow this exemption to legally access the most up-to-date footage.  Having to wait for the material to come to DVD would cause many videos to be stale or wholly irrelevant.

Our comments will also include support for a filmmaking exemption as well as ask for other key expansions in exemptions particularly important to the clients we serve.  In sum, our comment represents our direct experience with numerous individual examples that rely on critical exemptions.  The exemptions will not only benefit consumers and creators, but are in harmony with the spirit, purpose, and law of the Copyright Act.  

Value legal services for internet users and creators?  Support them.

Topics: 

Content Types: 

Tags: 

New Media Rights joins CyberTECH and others for Data Privacy Day 2015

New Media Rights is proud to announce we’ll be joining CyberTECH, Securing Our eCity and leading privacy experts for Data Privacy Day 2015: Securing the Internet of Things Masters on January 28, 2015. This event will bring together security and privacy experts from around the nation to address privacy concerns surrounding the growing Internet of Things to provide a clearer understanding of the perceptions and potential threats that will affect the collection, management and safeguarding of private information about individuals and organizations.

Learn more about Data Privacy Day 2015 and to find additional events near you here.

Value legal services for internet users and creators?  Support them.

Content Types: 

Top 5 mistakes startups make with their privacy policies

Privacy policies are a critical pre-launch step for many web based companies. But not all privacy policies are created equal. Here are the top five common mistakes we see startups make with their privacy policies.

5.    The company doesn't have a privacy policy.
Collecting information from your users without a privacy policy is remarkably risky. In some states it may even be illegal depending on the type of website you operate. For example in California, commercial websites that collect personally identifiable user information which includes information that is commonly collected by commercial websites like names, emails and addresses are required to have a privacy policy.  Even if you’re not in a state that requires your website to have a privacy policy, privacy policies are still helpful for setting consumer expectations regarding your use of their data.


4.    The company copy and pasted (insert big companies name here) privacy policy as their own.
While most major companies do employ very good privacy law attorneys to write their privacy policies, these policies are tailored for that company’s specific needs. Copying and pasting their privacy policies as your own use can lead to a whole host of problems. While some problems, like forgetting to replace their business name with your business name, hurt you more from a business and customer trust perspective. Other problems, like making promises to do things you don’t do and can’t actually do (i.e. removing user data in a set period of time), could be legally actionable. So while having a privacy policy is important, it’s even more important to have a privacy policy that fits your company’s specific needs.


3.    The privacy policy violates the privacy laws of the state in which the company is located.
Privacy law is a bit of a moving target and laws vary significantly from state to state. Certain state laws even contradict other states laws. However, as a rule of thumb it’s a very good idea to make sure you comply with any relevant federal privacy laws as well as the privacy laws of the state(s) where your business is located.  If you’re not sure what laws you need to comply with, we highly recommend consulting an attorney in your area.

2.    Consumers can’t find the privacy policy on the website.
It’s not just enough to have a privacy policy that is tailored to your company; your customers also need to be able to find it, understand it, and agree to it. Legal standards can vary as to what kind of notice is sufficient. It’s often a good best practice to make sure your privacy policy is linked (in a working link), in a legible font in the header, footer or other highly visible part of your website.  To ensure your users have agreed to your privacy policy, wherever users will be giving you their personal information it’s a good idea to clearly link to your privacy policy on that form above the send button to ensure that users have a chance to read it before they submit information.


1.    The privacy policy makes a promise the company can’t keep.
The number one rule of writing a good privacy policy is to only make promises you can actually keep. Making promises that sound privacy conscious that you can’t actually keep lulls your users into a false sense of trust and when that trust is broken it can be a PR nightmare. It can also be a legal nightmare. For example, the Federal Trade Commission can bring legal action against companies who misled their users about their privacy practices.

And as important as this rule is, it can also be the hardest to comply with because making truthful statements in your privacy policy doesn’t end with the drafting of your policy. It means making sure you keep that information up to date as your data collection practices change. It means making sure that your marketing and business teams understand what promises the company made so your advertising and business practices are in line with your privacy policy. Unfortunately, lack of communication between these teams is so common it’s become a business cliché.  But despite the cliché, making sure you only make promises you can keep in your privacy policy is the number one rule when it comes to privacy policies and the number one mistake we see startups make when it comes to privacy policies.

Are you making any of these common privacy policy mistakes? Make it your new year’s resolution to get your privacy policy in shape! If you have questions about your privacy policy or privacy law in general, feel free to reach out to New Media Rights via our contact form.

Value legal services for internet users and creators?  Support them.

Topics: 

Content Types: 

Tags: 

Our 2014 accomplishments!

Whether you’ve joined us as a Student or an Open Internet Defender we're stronger than ever thanks to support from individuals like you!

Please consider joining our community of supporters by making a donation and help us continue to fulfill our mission to:

  • Provide free and dramatically reduced fee one-to-one legal services to underserved creators and innovators that need specialized help with Internet, intellectual property, media, and technology law
  • Defend the Open Internet and push for badly needed copyright reform.
  • Create high quality legal educational materials and to educate the next generation of lawyers.

With your support we’ve done this and more in 2014 by:

In 2015, with your support we plan to:

  • Continuing to provide free and dramatically reduced fee one-to-one legal services to  400+ underserved creators and innovators.
  • Release a ground-breaking new legal educational tool to help creators.
  •  Sponsoring and organizing more than 12 workshops and community events throughout the San Diego region and throughout the United States about digital rights.
  • Working on policy initiatives to encourage the FCC to adopt real Net Neutrality measures.
  • Participating in the Copyright Offices 1201 hearings to make sure creators can access the materials they need to create and we can all make modifications to the technologies we own without risking criminal charges.

Value legal services for internet users and creators?  Support them.

Content Types: 

November Newsletter: Giving Tuesday--Night Owl Edition


New Media Rights



 

This Giving Tuesday, December 2, New Media Rights is running a one-day, 24-hour fundraiser where your donations will be matched dollar for dollar up to $10,000. So mark your calendar now and please pledge to give now by sending the dollar amount you want to pledge support@newmediarights.org.

Without your continued support, we can't do work like like helping local San Diego filmmaker Bill Perrine with his latest documentary film It’s Gonna Blow: San Diego's Music Underground 1986-1996.
 




Your donations help ensure we have the resources to reach a wide variety of clients to provide critical legal services, like the services we provided to Bill.
 
This year, we have a unique opportunity to double your impact to New Media Rights on Giving Tuesday. But there’s a catch. We’ll be competing will all of the other wonderful programs at California Western School of Law for that $10,000 match on a first come, first matched basis.
 
That means in order to maximize your impact we are asking
donors to give at 12:00am PST on December 2nd. As an added bonus, the first person to make a donation on Giving Tuesday at the Open Internet Defender Level or above will get a T-shirt from Bill Perrine’s latest documentary, It’s Gonna Blow.

 
Steps to help us rock Giving Tuesday:
Step 1:Pledge to give now by sending the dollar amount you want to pledge support@newmediarights.org.
Step 2 Click here to add a reminder to your calendar to give to New Media Rights on Giving Tuesday or join the facebook event!
Step 3: Don't forget to give on Giving Tuesday!
 
But wait?!? Why Should you give on Giving Tuesday?
 
By giving on Giving Tuesday, you can double your impact, and help us to do more great work like the work we did this year.
Thanks to your continued support we:

See a full list of our accomplishments for the year and our exciting plans for next year here!
 

All the best,

Art Neill, Teri Karobonik, and the New Media Rights team

 

Value legal services for internet users and creators?  Support them.

Topics: 

Content Types: 

Pages