How to register a DMCA agent

 

For more detailed information about how you can protect your website from liability for content your users submit by taking advantage of the DMCA safe harbors, click here.  This is a basic guide on the registration process for the DMCA safe harbor.  Of course, in addition to registering you must take a number of affirmative steps (terminating repeat infringers, responding to takedown notice) that we discuss in other guides.

Before using this guide, first identify whether you are an online service provider. Online service providers are websites which allow users to generate content of their own and upload it to the website. Examples include YouTube, Facebook, Livejournal, Wikipedia, and Craigslist. Blogs also may fall into this category, if they allow users to submit comments to the site. Heading up a website like these are a daunting task, let alone controlling every one of your users so that they do not upload any infringing materials. In order to shield yourself from being sued when an outsider posts infringing copyrighted content on your site, you can seek protection under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act's Safe Harbor Provision. 

Why and When You Must Register a DMCA Agent as an Online Service Provider

As an Online Service Provider, you may receive safe harbor protection under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act if you take certain steps (these are all detailed in another guide).  Procedurally, one of the most important steps you must take to receive safe harbor protection is registeration and thereafter, renewal of a DMCA agent. The agent’s purpose is to act as the point of contact who receives notifications of claimed infringement. For example, your agent will be contacted with DMCA takedown notices if or when a content owner believes his or her ownership rights have been violated.

The Copyright Office’s latest rule also requires services to re-register their DMCA agent with the Office every three years. What’s more, any website or service that has already registered with the Copyright Office must re-register their agent by December 31, 2017, in order to retain the protections that the DMCA provides. 

The agent’s contact information must be provided both to the U.S. Copyright Office and must be on your (the service provider’s) website in a location where the public may access it. You can browse the Old Directory of DMCA Designated Agents (prior to December 1, 2016) and the New Directory (December 1, 2016 and later)  at the Copyright Office's website  

Steps to Take to Register a DMCA Agent

1. Review the tutorial video for registration here.

2. Electronically register for a designated agent account with the Copyright Office here.

 

 

3.​ Find a form or create your own

The Copyright Office does have suggested formats available for filing either an Interim Designation or an Amended Designation. Use the Interim Designation form to designate an agent, and use the Amended Designation form to amend a previously filed “Designation of Agent.” Note that Amended Designations entirely replace rather than supplement Interim Designations.

The Copyright Office does not require that you use the forms it provides, but does encourage it. It is simpler to use the forms, however, because if you opt to create your own form you are responsible for ensuring that it includes all information required in section 201.38 (c) or (f) (as appropriate) of the interim regulations.

4. Fill out the form

It is worth noting that the entire Interim Designation or Amended Designation that you submit will be posted on the Copyright Office’s website. Therefore, you should only include information in the designation submission that is intended to be publicly posted. If extraneous information is included in the submission that is not required by the interim regulations, that information will also be scanned and posted on the website.5

5. Determine the fee and deliver the form to the US Copyright Office

Regardless of whether you register electronically or submit a hard copy using the forms provided by the Copyright Office or your own, a printed copy of the completed form, together with the appropriate fee, must then be mailed (or hand-delivered) to the Copyright Office.

You must include the appropriate fee with your Interim Designation or an Amended Designation, which you can find here under "other copyright service fees" tab, subsection "miscellaneous fees." As of December 1, 2016, DMCA registration will only be $6. This is a significant discount from the $105 (plus additional fees for each alternative domain names) registration currently costs. 

Note that the fee for filing includes a designation of an agent and lets you list only one name for the service provider. This should be the service provider’s legal name.

If you have alternative names (for example additional URLs), you will want to include them in the same filing so you do not pay repeatedly to register. When you file alternative names in your filing, each group of 10 alternative names (or fewer) will require the payment of an additional fee. The additional fee for 10 (or fewer) alternative names is currently $35, in addition to the $6 basic filling fee.

The same fee structure detailed above applies to Amended designations, which replace the prior interim designation. Any additional names listed in an amended designation replace (they do not supplement) the alternative names that will be associated with the service provider. To add additional alternative names to the existing alternative names, every alternative name should be listed on your amended designation, and you will calculate the fee based on this.

Checks are payable to the Register of Copyrights.

Mail the forms to:

Copyright RRP

P.O. Box 71537

Washington, DC 20024

Or, you may personally deliver them to:

Public Information Office of the Copyright Office,

James Madison Memorial Building, Library of Congress,

101 Independence Avenue, SE, Washington, DC

Open Monday-Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. EST (except federal holidays).

6. Post your DMCA agent’s contact information in a publicly accessible location on your site

 
 

In addition to registering and posting your DMCA agent information, you must take a number of affirmative steps. YouTube has perfected this practice by making users verify that they are not infringing copyright when they upload content, as well as providing an easily readable Terms of Service and Copyright Policy. Other practices include terminating repeat infringers, responding to takedown notices, and others that we discuss in other guides on this site. You should also consult other websites' Terms of Service and policies to come up with further ideas of how you should present yours. The key objective is just to make it easiest for everyone to know and follow the rules.

 

 

Finally, you may also want to consult the FAQ on DMCA found on the Copyright Office's website.

 

Value free legal services for creators like you?  Support them.

Find additional articles by

Related Topics: 

Related Types of Content: 

Additional Tags: 

Viacom Round-Up: Still Complaining about YouTube Even as They Profit from It

Viacom’s appeal of the district court’s decision in Viacom v. YouTube is well underway, and now the amicus briefs supporting Viacom have been filed as well. The arguments in Viacom’s opening brief largely rehash many of the same arguments Viacom made—unsuccessfully—the first time around: Generalized awareness of some infringing content, and failure to take down such unidentified content, disqualifies a service provider from the DMCA’s safe harbors; YouTube’s compliance with the DMCA proves its DMCA-disqualifying ability to control the infringing activity on its network; DMCA protection for YouTube’s “storage” of uploaded content does not include the display of the content on the site; and so on.

Amici chime in with their familiar doomsday refrain. For instance, the American Federation of Musicians’ filing states: "YouTube is more than a widespread infringer of copyrights; it was a catalyst and engine for copyright infringement on a global scale, unleashing a Pandora’s box of illegal activity that will continue to threaten the output of America’s creative industries for years to come." Other briefs make similarly dire predictions.

This kind of language would not have been surprising five years ago. Big media has a long history of knee-jerk opposition to disruptive innovation. But it’s curious that Viacom and its supporters should still be so determined to kill a platform that’s become a revenue source for the media industry. Content owners including Viacom and other amici are making real money from their share of YouTube advertising dollars (which is doubtless one of the reasons Viacom is not seeking redress for activities after mid-2008). YouTube reports that “[h]undreds of partners are making six figures a year.” Media companies use YouTube as well to promote their proprietary content for indirect profit. Importantly, independent artists are also among the content owners who use—and indeed, often rely on—YouTube for a promotional and financial forum. Were it not for the DMCA safe harbors, this creative and financial engine could not sustain itself.

Let’s be clear: as we’ve previously noted, Viacom and its supporters are seeking a re-write of the DMCA that would put all kinds of online service providers at risk of huge statutory damages for copyright infringement. Is copyright infringement committed on eBay every day by some users? Do people use Microsoft's Bing to find infringing materials? Sure. Obviously these services are also enormously beneficial to businesses and consumers. But they (and many other) online services would not exist without the DMCA safe harbors.

And because they exist, Hollywood and the recording industry have a chance to benefit from new business models they were unable to come up with themselves. Why not embrace them? Because despite decades of evidence to the contrary, big media can’t get over the idea that the only acceptable media innovation environment is one that starts with innovators begging permission from Hollywood.

EFF will be filing our own brief in support of YouTube, and we’re hopeful that, in addition to standing firm on the DMCA, the court of appeals will note YouTube’s growing role in creating revenue opportunities for creators, both big and small.

Taxonomy upgrade extras: 

U.S. v. Warshak: Court protects email privacy under the 4th Amendment

By Thomas Yohannan

 

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals handed down an important decision that affords emails protection under the Fourth Amendment.  The amendment protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures.  In U.S. v Warshak, the court ruled that although an internet service provider (ISP) has access to private emails, the government must obtain a search warrant before it may seize and search such emails.  


The Sixth Circuit ruling also declares part of the Stored Communications Act (SCA) of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act unconstitutional.  18 U.S.C. 2703(b) allows the government to obtain email messages with less than a search warrant. The SCA has been widely criticized by the Digital Due Process coalition for allowing government access to emails without a search warrant.  

 

The issue that the court dealt with in this case was the expectation of privacy that is afforded to email hosted on a remote server.  The court said:

 

“Given the fundamental similarities between email and traditional forms of communication [like postal mail and telephone calls], it would defy common sense to afford emails lesser Fourth Amendment protection.... It follows that email requires strong protection under the Fourth Amendment; otherwise the Fourth Amendment would prove an ineffective guardian of private communication, an essential purpose it has long been recognized to serve....”

 

It was an important decision providing protections for internet users’ online privacy in the area of emails, and articulates that the Fourth Amendment provides important limitations to the government’s ability to access private lives of its citizens, and those limits extend online. Further, the decision may nudge Congressional onlookers to amend the SCA so that a search warrant is required. 

Find additional articles by

Related Types of Content: 

Additional Tags: 

Whistleblower legislation supported by New Media Rights passes in the Senate

New Media Rights joined the call for stronger whistleblower protection by supporting S. 372 over the last few months with our friends from the Government Accountability Project and numerous other public interest organizations.   Last Friday, the Senate unanimously approved the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act (S. 372), bringing us closer to achieving enhanced whistleblower protections than ever before. The House could vote on the bill as early as tomorrow. The letter included here encourages the House of Representatives to protect Whistleblowers and Taxpayers by passing this legislation.

As the debates surrounding the future of speech on the Internet continue, it is important to recognize the important role that whistleblowers play in exposing corruption, waste, and fraud in our governments and corporations.

To Help Pass Whistleblower Protections in the House of Representatives sign this petition.


An Open Letter to Members of the House of Representatives:

Ensure that the Bipartisan Reforms Long Supported by the House

Become Law This Year. Passing S. 372 Will Protect Both Whistleblowers and Taxpayers


               For the past two Congresses, the House of Representatives has passed, with strong bipartisan support, reform legislation that protects federal employees who blow the whistle on waste, fraud and abuse.  This year, bipartisan support for these reforms advanced in the Senate, and late last week the Senate unanimously approved S. 372, the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act.   This legislation, which reflects a true compromise between Senate and House versions of whistleblower reform, must become law this year.


             In no time in our history is whistleblower reform more crucial: This country must address our growing federal debt and cannot afford to tolerate waste, fraud and abuse in the federal government.  With this crisis looming, we urge you to fulfill your commitments to taxpayers and pass S. 372.


                Protecting whistleblowers is a reform that has strong support across ideological lines.  The groups on this letter are united in this urgent request that federal employees, the foot soldiers in the war on waste, fraud and abuse, get the protections they deserve.  They must be able to fight back when they are fired, harassed or demoted in retaliation for their efforts to protect the public health and safety and taxpayer dollars.


               Unfortunately, under current law the Merit Systems Protection Board rules against 99% of whistleblowers who file suit to defend themselves against retaliation.  Fear of committing career suicide leads federal workers to become silent observers when they witness fraud, waste or abuse.  Congress can and must enact a whistleblower reform law that ensures that federal whistleblowers who are punished for speaking the truth have the tools they need to fight subsequent retaliation, and win.  Congress must significantly strengthen these protections, but time is running short.  Passage of the pending Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act (S. 372) must be a priority for the House in the lame duck.


              We know that whistleblowers save money.  Each year, whistleblower lawsuits under the False Claims Act save taxpayers nearly one billion dollars.  A recent PricewaterhouseCoopers study of corporations globally found that employee disclosures were responsible for detection of more fraud than auditors, internal compliance officers , wand law enforcement combined.


             While S. 372 does not include every reform that our community has sought, it will dramatically improve the status quo—for whistleblowers and taxpayers.  Please do not delay in making this whistleblower protection legislation with strong bipartisan.   support law.  If you are serious about responding to American voters, reducing the debt, and ensuring the integrity of government, you will do all you can to make whistleblower reform a reality this year.


Sincerely,


Affiliation of Christian Engineers

AFGE Council 238 (U.S. EPA AFGE Locals)

American Association of Law Libraries

American Civil Liberties Union

American Federation of Government Employees

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME)

Association of American Publishers

Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now 8 (ACORN 8)

Bill of Rights Defense Committee

Black Autonomy Network Community Organization (BANCO)

C-10 Research and Education Foundation

Center for Biological Diversity

Center for Lobbying in the Public Interest

CERES, the Center for Environmental Research and Education thru Synergy

Citizen Power

Citizens for Safe Water Around Badger

Colorado Clean Water Advocates

Concerned Citizens of Petersburg

CROP PLUS (Concerned Residents of Portland, NY + People Like Us)

Custom Employees Against Discrimination Association (CEADA)

DC Employment Justice Center

Delaware Action Group

Department for Professional Employees, AFL-CIO

Disaster Accountability Project

Energy Justice Network

Environmental Working Group

FAA Whistleblowers Alliance

Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association

Federation of American Scientists

Focus on Indiana

Food Not Bombs

Fort Worth Citizens Against Neighborhood Drilling Operations

Foundation for Global Community

Fund for Constitutional Government

Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives

Global Warming Education Network

Government Accountability Project

Green Party of Pennsylvania

Greenpeace

Greenwich Citizens Committee, Inc.

Health Integrity Project

Help Abolish Legal Tyranny (HALT)

Help For Sewage Victims

Homeowners Against Deficient Dwellings

Implode-Explode Heavy Industry, Inc.

International Association of Whistleblowers

International Medical Council on Vaccinations

Media Alliance

MidlandCares

MPD PRODUCTIONS, INC.

National Coalition of Organized Women

National Family Farm Coalition

National Forum On Judicial Accountability

National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc.

National Religious Campaign Against Torture

National Taxpayers Union

National Treasury Employees Union

New Media Rights

New Mexico Environmental Law Center

New Orleans Women's Shelter

Nuclear Watch South

OAK - Organizations Associating for the Kind of Change America Really Needs

OMB Watch

OpenTheGovernment.org

Oregon Wildlife Federation

PCP PRIDE (People Rising in Defense of Ecology)

POPULAR, Inc. - Power Over Poverty Under Laws of America Restored    

Private Citizen, Inc.

Project On Government Oversight

Public Citizen

Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility

Responsible Charge

San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace  

Santa Monicans For Safe Drinking Water Coalition

Scientists for Indigenous People

Semmelweis Society International

Sustainable Energy and Economy Network

Tax Justice Network USA

Terra Foundation

Texas Campaign for the Environment

Texas Injured Workers

The Ecology Party of Florida

The Employment Law Group

The Vermont Yankee Decommissioning Alliance

Trivalley Cares

Union of Concerned Scientists

Voices for Corporate Responsibility

Workplace Fairness

Find additional articles by

Related Types of Content: 

Additional Tags: 

You are registered for Drumbeat San Diego!

Thank you for registering! You are critical to shaping this event, so pitch your project, lend your skills, and get involved today in shaping Drumbeat San Diego!

If you have an idea for a project or space at the event, please share it with the Drumbeat San Diego Google Group at http://groups.google.com/group/DrumbeatSanDiego, email us at drumbeat@newmediarights.org, or give us a call at 619-591-8870.

If you are interested in helping organize the event contact drumbeat@newmediarights.org and attend an organizing meeting.

We will offer updates about Drumbeat San Diego as we build towards our February 5, 2011 event.

We’re looking forward to building, learning, and innovating with you at Drumbeat San Diego!

If you have any questions or problems with registration please email us at drumbeat@newmediarights.org or call us at 619-591-8870

Jordan: Football Violence or Racism?

By Betsy

News reports estimate that 250 people were injured following a football game in south Amman between the Wihdat team, usually followed by Jordanians of Palestinian heritage, and the al-Faisali team, usually supported by Jordanians of Transjordanian heritage.

Some Tweeters focused on condemning the violence:

@Namleh Athletes must have a forgiving heart & high respect for each other! sadly that was not the case at the football game in #jo

Others blamed one team for the violence; 5hadz blamed the Faisali supporters:

@anammari No, el Wehdateye bi7ayathom ma balasho fight, it's always been el Faisaleye.

http://twitter.com/5hadz/status/13531784515952640

No, in their lives the Wihdat supporters have not started a fight, it's always been the Faisali supporters.

Dania Ab blamed the Wehdat fans:

We all know how savage wi7dat team are,oo ya reet kan el darakyeen thaba7ohom o 7aragohom kman bekon a7san #Jo” هذاتفكيرلايجدي

We all know how savage the Wihdat team are, and I wish that the gendarme had slaughtered or burned them; it would be better

Noha Safar was quick to condemn this violent language:

“@Daniiiaa: We all know how savage wi7dat team are,oo ya reet kan el darakyeen thaba7ohom o 7aragohom kman bekon a7san #Jo” هذاتفكيرلايجدي

“We all know how savage the Wihdat team are, and I wish that the gendarme had slaughtered or burned them; it would be better” - This kind of thinking does not work.

Even an MP joined in the blame game:

@5hadz Even MPs .. الفايز مع اتخاذ عقوبات بحق النادي الذي تسبب جمهوره بهذه الاحداث He means Wehdat? http://bit.ly/gmK2ca

Al Fayez (an MP) favors sanctions against the club that incited the audience to these events. He means Wihdat?

Many Tweeters, though, focused their ire on the Al-Jazeera coverage of the events, which blamed the Jordanian police forces, and ongoing racism for the violence:

Sanad Azab wrote:

Such a BS misleading report “@fayez: تقرير #الجزيرة حول ضرب الدرك للجمهور #jo #video http://j.mp/e0PePz”

Such a BS misleading report. Al-Jazeera's report on the police beating the fans.

Ayment Saket agreed:

Although #AlJazeera stated that #AlWihdat fans broke the fences in celebration, and crushed each other, they put the blame on #Jo police.

Ahmad Ammari wrote:

We all know it's not but Al Jazeera is trying to make it #JO Gov thing now RT @5hadz: اه لإنو هاي هي مشكلت العنصرية في الأردن، لعبة كرة قدم!

Oh, because of this there is a racism problem in Jordan - a football game!

Taxonomy upgrade extras: 

Unpublished

Drumbeat San Diego registration form (DRAFT ONLY!)

Drumbeat SD Registration

Submit the short form below to register to participate in Drumbeat San Diego!

While registration is free, space is limited to about 100 participants, so please sign up when you know you are committed to attending the event.

To learn more about the event, visit our Invitation to Drumbeat San Diego.

What: Drumbeat San Diego
Where: Queen Bees Art & Cultural Center, 3925 Ohio St., San Diego, CA 92104
When: Saturday February 5, 2011 1-7pm

We look forward to building, learning, and innovating with you at Drumbeat San Diego!

While the registration for the event is free, we hope that you will DONATE, as this event is a community collaboration and there are costs involved. We greatly appreciate you giving.

  *
I am a...











     

Once you have clicked register you are a critical part of shaping this event. So pitch your project, lend your skills, and get involved today in shaping Drumbeat San Diego! If you have an idea for a project or space at the event, please share it with the Drumbeat San Diego Google Group at http://groups.google.com/group/DrumbeatSanDiego, email us at drumbeat@newmediarights.org, or give us a call at 619-591-8870.

If you are interested in helping organize the event contact drumbeat@newmediarights.org and attend an organizing meeting. We will offer updates about Drumbeat San Diego as we build towards our February 5, 2011 event. We’re looking forward to building, learning, and innovating with you at Drumbeat San Diego!

Your invitation to Drumbeat San Diego

New Media Rights and the Drumbeat San Diego community invite you to Drumbeat San Diego, Saturday February 5, 2011 at the Queen Bees Art & Cultural Center in North Park, San Diego, CA.

What: Drumbeat San Diego
Where: Queen Bees Art & Cultural Center, 3925 Ohio St., San Diego, CA 92104
When: Saturday February 5, 2011 1-7pm

Register for this event today for free at: www.newmediarights.org/drumbeat/register

This participatory, hands-on event will offer a variety of spaces for the technology community to connect with community groups, artists,
filmmakers, citizen journalists, musicians and others who are interested in building information tools and using the open Internet to improve the local San Diego community.

Drumbeat San Diego is your chance to come together in a fun and exciting space to build projects that have an impact in our community and the broader world. It is part of a worldwide movement led by the Mozilla Foundation’s Drumbeat initiative.

Check out the current Agenda!

You are critical to shaping this event, so pitch your project, lend your skills, and get involved today in shaping Drumbeat San Diego!

If you have an idea for a project or space at the event, please share it with the Drumbeat San Diego Google Group at http://groups.google.com/group/DrumbeatSanDiego, email us at drumbeat@newmediarights.org, or give us a call at 619-591-8870.

If you are interested in helping organize the event contact drumbeat@newmediarights.org.

We’re looking forward to building, learning, and innovating with you February 5, 2011 at Drumbeat San Diego.

www.newmediarights.org/drumbeat/register

Sincerely,

The Drumbeat Organizing Team

List of organizers and partner organizations to come.

Find additional articles by

Additional Tags: 

Pages