| Original content from EFF-Breaking News reproduced under a CC Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 license. |
How can New Media Rights help you?
New Media Rights answers questions from the public and takes media inquiries regarding the law and technology. Please contact us if you have a question and we'll be glad to assist you. Our free legal and how-to resources, as well as our free public media studio and equipment, are supported by donations by individuals like you, so please consider donating today! Contact us for legal assistance at (619) 591-8870.
Apple Rejects EFF Updates App, Claims Parody Content Is Objectionable
Last month, EFFi got an email from software developer Duane Fields of Exact Magic, asking if we he could use our logo on an iPhonei application that exclusively displays content from EFF's RSSi feed. Sounded like a great idea to us, as long as it was clear that the app wasn't an EFF-sponsored product.
But this morning Apple rejected the app. Why? Because it claims EFF's content runs afoul of the iTune's App Store's policy against "objectionable" content. Apparently, Apple objects to a blog post that linked to a "Downfall" parody video created by EFF Board Chairman Brad Templeton. The parody casts Hitler in the role of entertainment industry executive, ranting about the failure of DRMi and the continued popularity of fair use. The parody includes the fleeting appearance of the f-bomb in a subtitle.

Now, Apple may find EFF "objectionable" for any number of reasons (here's just one.) But surely linking to a video that includes a "bad word" can't be one of them. After all, the YouTube app that Apple includes on every iPhone that ships will let you watch exactly the same video, bad word and all. And you can use the Safari web browser that ships with every iPhone to access EFF's website, as well as millions of web sites that include much more extreme language.
This is just the latest example of the failings of Apple's iTunes App Store approval process, which has been revealed to be not just anti-competitive, discriminatory, censorial, and arbitrary, but downright absurd. Just last month, Apple was widely criticized when it rejected the Eucalyptus e-book reader because it could access the public domain translation of the Kama Sutra (Apple quickly reversed course on that one).
Let's be clear: we are not saying that Apple has to carry apps it doesn't like in its App Store. But iPhone owners who don't want Apple playing the role of language police for their software should have the freedom to go elsewhere. This is precisely why EFF has asked the Copyrighti Office to grant an exemption to the DMCA for jailbreaking iPhones. It's none of Apple's business if I want an app on my phone that lets me read EFF's RSS feed, use Sling Player over 3G, or read the Kama Sutra.
Filed Under


















Post new comment