BarCamp San Diego

Visit BarCamp Sandiego's website

What

BarCamp San Diego is an unconference made up of of technical professionals, Internet enthusiasts, and other clever people in the Southern California area who wish to share and learn in an open environment.

Attendees don't just watch a set list of speakers. They give their own talks. Podcasting. Web standards. Microformats. Gum stick computers. Physical security. Robotics. Evolutionary algorithms. . It can be anything. This event is not just for stuffy developer types - one of the best barcamp presentations ever given was about sandwiches. Barcamp is what you make of it.

When

May 3 - 4, 2008
10am Saturday through 5pm Sunday, and we mean it. Although barcamps are typically an overnight event, in San Diego we don't take the "camp" part lightly. Even though we'll be spending the night locked in the depths of Microsoft, feel free to bring tents, sleeping bags, and other cozy camp gear (no fire, plz). You don't have to stay if you don't want to, but the most interesting parts of barcamp tend to happen at night. Alcohol will also be liberally supplied starting at dinner, and we want you coming back for Sunday's talks in one piece. wino kredyt mieszkaniowy sprzedam mieszkanie sprzedam bilet

Where

Microsoft
9255 Towne Centre Dr # 400
San Diego, CA map

Registration

Add your name to the list below so that 1) we know how many bodies to prepare for, 2)other people can see what kind of talks to expect, and 3) let your fellow barcampers know what you'd be interested in hearing more about. Here are the men's and women's American Apparel sizing charts if you need them.

If you're not familiar with wiki markup, click edit and then look for the line that says REGISTRATION LIST ENDS HERE and follow the directions. Email Lisa if you have any problems.

Don't forget to proclaim your attendance in typical Web 2.0 fashion on Eventful, Upcoming, and Facebook, too!

New Media Rights RSS Feeds

All NMR content

Blogs only

RSS makes it possible to keep up with your favorite web sites (like newmediarights.org) in an automated manner that's easier than checking manually. Basically, you get whatever you want sent to you automatically, without having to constantly go to a web page looking for updates.

RSS stands for "Really Simple Syndication" and is used to publish frequently updated content such as news, blogs, or podcasts. A "feed" is an RSS document that contains either a summary of content from a web site or the full text.

RSS content can be read using software called a "feed reader" or an "aggregator" (see list below). You can subscribe to a feed by entering the feed's link into the software reader or by clicking an RSS icon in a browser that starts the subscription process. The software reader checks your subscribed feeds regularly for new content, downloading any updates that it finds.

The following aggregators are used as examples only, they are not endorsed by NMR. Also, don't forget to check out our RSS section for more info on the subject.

Software Aggregators

Akregator (KDE/Linux/cross-platform)
AmphetaDesk (cross-platform)
BlogBridge (cross-platform)
Feedview, a Firefox extension (cross-platform)
FeedDemon (Windows)
Hubdog (Windows Mobile)
Liferea (Linux)
NetNewsWire (Mac OS)
NewsAccess (Mac OS)
NewsBreak (Windows Mobile)
NewsFire (Mac OS)
RSSOwl (cross-platform)
Sage, a Firefox extension (cross-platform)
SharpReader (Windows)
Shrook (Mac OS)
Thinfeeder (cross-platform)
Vienna (Mac OS)

Web Aggregators

Bloglines
Google Reader
Netvibes
NewsIsFree
NewsGator
Rojo

Little Brother audiobook: DRM-free and remixable!

Link to purchase and download this audiobook without Flash interaction
My next novel, Little Brother, officially goes on sale today! In addition to the US print edition, there's a DRM-free audio edition (there's also forthcoming editions in the UK, Greece, Russia, France and Norway, with others pending) from Random House Audio. My deal with Random House is that they're absolutely not allowed to sell the book with DRM on it, which, sadly, means that Audible (the largest audiobook store in the world) won't carry it -- they insist on selling books with DRM, even when authors and publishers don't want it.

Instead, you can buy the audiobook from Zipidee, a retailer that Random House uses -- they have the spiffy embeddable Flash sales-object you see above (feel free to paste it into your own blog or whatnot), and there's also this static URL for those of you who can't use Flash.

The audiobook comes with my own sampling license: once you own it, you're free to take up to 30 minutes' worth of material from it and remix and then redistribute it as much as you like, provided that you do so on a noncommercial basis, make sure that it's clear that this is a remix and not the original, and make sure that you tell people where to find the original. This is in addition to all the fair use remixing that you're allowed to do without my permission (of course!).

I'll also be releasing (as always!) a free, Creative Commons-licensed version of the text of Little Brother, just as soon as I get back to London (I'm presently in Toronto, visiting my family with my newborn daughter). It'll likely be Monday or so -- there's a bunch of little clean-uppy things I need to do with the Little Brother distribution site that I need to be in my office with uninterrupted time to accomplish. Link to audiobook, Link to buy Little Brother

Taxonomy upgrade extras: 

NYPD cops videoed illegally warring on photographers

Sam sez,

In March 2007, a free speech and free assembly rally was held in Union Square to protest a new NYPD rule of dubious constitutionality instituting a permit requirement for any assembly of 50+ people on foot or on bike in NYC.

While the restriction would apply to any assembly of 50 or more people, it was enacted as transparent attempt shut down, harass or frustrate the Critical Mass bicycle rides that have occured monthly in Manhattan for at least ten years.

After the rally proper, a Critical Mass ride (accompanied by citizen videographers from the Glass Bead Collective and other groups) set out north from Union Square, only to be subjected to outrageous and illegal treatment by NYPD officers in Times Square under the supervision and instigation of Sgt. Timothy Horhoe.

Despite the numerous video-verified complaints of unlawful arrest and the numerous provably false sworn statements in police reports documenting the incident, the Civilian Complaint Review Board said in March of this year that they cannot act to punish the officers involved for their willful perjury.

Link (Thanks, Sam!)

Taxonomy upgrade extras: 

New book: The Illustrated Guide to Home Chemistry Experiments

200804281510.jpg

O'Reilly's Make: Books launched a new series of books called DIY Science, and the first one is The Illustrated Guide to Home Chemistry Experiements, by Robert Bruce Thompson. Here's the preface to the book, which I found very inspiring.

Christmas morning, 1964. I was 11 years old. My younger brother and I arose at the crack of dawn and noisily rushed downstairs to find out what was under the tree. Our parents followed us, bleary-eyed.

Santa had been good to us that year. Colorfully-wrapped presents were scattered, not just under the tree, but across most of the living room floor. Being boys, we started tearing open the presents with no thought at all for the care that had gone into wrapping them. We were after the loot.

There were the inevitable disappointments. Sweaters from grandma, school clothes from Aunt Betty, and hand-knitted stocking caps for both of us from Pete and Sarah, our elderly next-door neighbors. But there was plenty of good stuff, too. Sports equipment and a cap pistol for my younger brother. A battery-powered Polaris nuclear submarine that actually fired small plastic missiles. A bicycle for my brother and a BB gun for me! Lots of books, the kind we both liked to read. A casting set, with a lead furnace and molds to make toy soldiers.

As we opened the packages, my brother and I mentally checked off items against our wish lists. We’d both gotten everything we asked for. Almost. One item had been at the top of every iteration of my wish list since the Sears Christmas Wish Book had arrived, and that item was nowhere to be found. I searched frantically through the piles of discarded wrapping paper, hoping I’d overlooked a box. It wasn’t there.

My parents had been watching my brother and me ripping through gifts like Tasmanian Devils. Just as I’d decided that I hadn’t gotten the one gift that I really, really wanted, mom and dad called me into the kitchen. There it sat, on the kitchen table, exactly what I’d been hoping for. It was already unboxed and spread wide open to show the contents. My father said, “This is from your mother and me. It is not a toy.”

It was a Lionel/Porter/Chemcraft chemistry set, and the exact model I’d asked for. The biggest one, with dozens of chemicals and hundreds of experiments. Glassware, an alcohol lamp, a balance, even a centrifuge. Everything I needed to do real chemistry. I instantly forgot about the rest of my presents, even the BB gun. I started reading the manual, jumping from one experiment to another. I carefully examined each of the chemical bottles. The names of the chemicals were magical. Copper sulfate, sodium carbonate, sulfur, cobalt chloride, logwood, potassium ferricyanide, ferrous ammonium sulfate, and dozens more.

I used the balance to weigh something for the first time. I put an object in one of the balance pans and carefully added weights to the other pan until the needle was centered. As I was about to jump on to something else, my dad brought me to a screeching halt. “Write it down,” he said. “A scientist records what he observes. If you don’t work methodically and write down what you observe, you’re not a scientist. You’re just playing around.” I’ve been recording my observations ever since.

I soon lost interest in the other gifts, but getting that chemistry set was a life-changing experience. My mother told me years later that she and my dad had hoped that the chemistry set would hold my interest for at least a few weeks. As it turned out, it held my interest a bit longer. With my dad’s help I built a chemistry workbench in the basement, and later a photographic darkroom. I scrounged equipment and chemicals from every source I could think of, and saved up for things that required cash money. I spent every spare moment in that lab, and went on to major in chemistry in college and graduate school. Even now, more than 40 years later, I have a chemistry lab in the basement. It’s a much better lab than the one I had back in the 1960s, but the work habits I learned then stand me in good stead now.

What I experienced that Christmas morning was repeated in millions of other homes through the years as boys (and, alas, only a few girls) opened their first chemistry sets. From the 1930s through the 1960s, chemistry sets were among the most popular Christmas gifts, selling in the millions. It’s said that in the 1940s and 1950s there was a chemistry set in nearly every household where there was a child. Even as late as the 1970s, chemistry sets remained popular and were on display in every toy store and department store. And then something bad happened. By the 1980s, chemistry sets had become a dying breed. Few stores carried them, and most of those sets that remained available were pale shadows of what chemistry sets had been back in the glory days.

The decline of chemistry sets had nothing to do with lack of interest. Kids were and are as interested as ever. It was society that had changed. Manufacturers and retailers became concerned about liability and lawsuits, and “chemical” became a dirty word. Most chemistry sets were “defanged” to the point of uselessness, becoming little more than toys. Some so-called “chemistry sets” nowadays are actually promoted as using “no heat, no glass, and no chemicals,” as if that were something to be proud of. They might just as well promote them as “no chemistry.”

Even the best chemistry set that is still sold, the $200 Thames & Kosmos Chem C3000, is an unfortunate compromise among cost, liability, and marketability. The Chem C3000 kit lacks such essential equipment as a balance and a thermometer, provides little glassware, and includes only the tiny amounts of chemicals needed to do unsatisfying micro-scale chemistry experiments. Despite these criticisms, the C3000 kit is a good choice for giving late elementary school or early middle school students their first exposure to hands-on chemistry lab work. It allows kids to produce bright colors and stinky smells, which after all are the usual hooks that draw kids into chemistry. The problem is, that’s not enough.

Laboratory work is the essence of chemistry, and measurement is the essence of laboratory work. A hands-on introduction to real chemistry requires real equipment and real chemicals, and real, quantitative experiments. No existing chemistry set provides anything more than a bare start on those essentials, so the obvious answer is to build your own chemistry set and use it to do real chemistry.

Everything you need is readily available, and surprisingly inexpensive. For not all that much more than the cost of a toy chemistry set, you can buy the equipment and chemicals you need to get started doing real chemistry. Of course, the main reason for that is the absence of the hidden liability surcharge. If you buy a chemistry set and burn yourself with the alcohol lamp, you might sue the maker of the chemistry set. If you buy an alcohol lamp by itself and burn yourself, you have no one else to blame.

So what about the very real dangers involved in serious chemistry lab work? After all, some of the experiments in this book use concentrated acids, flammable liquids, corrosives, and poisons. In one experiment we manufacture napalm, for heaven’s sake. Will readers of this book be dropping like flies, blowing themselves up, burning the house down, or growing extra arms? Of course not. Dangers can be dealt with. One of the recurring lessons throughout this book is the importance of assuming personal responsibility for useful but dangerous actions—understanding the specific risks and taking the necessary steps to minimize or eliminate them.

I set out to write this book after a conversation with our friend and neighbor Jasmine Littlejohn. At age 14, Jasmine is a bright kid who’s interested in science as a career. I asked her one day how much science she was learning in school. “Hardly any,” she replied. “On a typical day, we spend hours on math, social studies, English, and other stuff, and about 15 minutes on science.” Although Jasmine attends a good public school, like most schools it devotes little time and few resources to science and has only limited lab facilities. No doubt the school would plead money and safety concerns as reasons, but such excuses do nothing to help Jasmine.

With her mom’s approval, I could give Jasmine access to my basement chemistry lab, but that would solve only part of the problem. If Jasmine was to do more than make pretty colors and stinky smells, if Jasmine was to do real chemistry, she’d need more than just access to a lab. She’d need detailed instructions and some sort of structured plan to guide her through the learning process. She’d need to learn how to use the equipment and how to handle chemicals safely. She’d need well-designed experiments that focused on specific aspects of laboratory work. In other words, she’d need a home chemistry lab handbook, one devoted to serious chemistry rather than just playing around.

My first thought was to get Jasmine one of the classic home chemistry books published back in the 30s, 40s, or 50s. Some of those were excellent, but all of them required chemicals—such as benzene, carbon tetrachloride, salts of mercury, lead, and barium, concentrated nitric acid, and so on—that were once readily available but are now very expensive or difficult to obtain.

In one sense, that wasn’t really a problem. I already had most of that stuff in my lab. But even the best of those old books would have required some serious red-lining before I’d have turned Jasmine loose with it. One, for example, suggested tasting highly toxic lead acetate (also known as “sugar of lead”) to detect its sweetness. Others were a bit casual about handling soluble mercury compounds or contained experiments that were potentially extremely dangerous.

I concluded that the only good solution was to write a new book, one devoted to learning real chemistry at home, and one that would also be useful for the many thousands of other people out there—young people and adults—who wanted to experience the magic of chemistry just as I’d done on that long-ago Christmas morning, and to do so on a reasonably small budget with readily-available equipment and chemicals. And so Illustrated Guide to Home Chemistry Experiments was born.

Who This Book is For

This book is for anyone, from responsible teenagers to adults, who wants to learn about chemistry by doing real, hands-on laboratory experiments.

DIY hobbyists and science enthusiasts can use this book to master all of the essential practical skills and fundamental knowledge needed to pursue chemistry as a lifelong hobby. Home school students and public school students whose schools offer only lecture-based chemistry courses can use this book to gain practical experience in real laboratory chemistry. A student who completes all of the laboratories in this book has done the equivalent of two full years of high school chemistry lab work or a first-year college general chemistry laboratory course.

And, finally, a word about who this book is not for. If you want to make fireworks and explosives—or perhaps we should say if all you want to make is fireworks and explosives—this book is not for you. If your goal is to produce black powder or nitroglycerine or TATP, you’ll have to look elsewhere. Nor will you find instructions in this book for producing methamphetamine in your home lab or synthesizing other illegal substances. In short, if you plan to break the law, this book is not for you.

How This Book is Organized

The first part of this book is made up of narrative chapters that cover the essential “book learning” you need to equip your home chemistry lab, master laboratory skills, and work safely in your lab.

1. Introduction

2. Laboratory Safety

3. Equipping a Home Chemistry Lab

4. Chemicals for the Home Chemistry Lab

5. Mastering Laboratory Skills

The bulk of the book is made up of seventeen hands-on laboratory chapters, each devoted to a particular topic. Most of the laboratory chapters include multiple laboratory sessions, from introductory level sessions suitable for a middle school or first-year high school chemistry laboratory course to more advanced sessions suitable for students who intend to take the College Board Advanced Placement (AP) Chemistry exam.

6. Laboratory: Separating Mixtures

7. Laboratory: Solubility and Solutions

8. Laboratory: Colligative Properties of Solutions

9. Laboratory: Introduction to Chemical Reactions & Stoichiometry

10. Laboratory: Reduction-Oxidation (Redox) Reactions

11. Laboratory: Acid-Base Chemistry

12. Laboratory: Chemical Kinetics

13. Laboratory: Chemical Equilibrium and Le Chatelier’s Principle

14. Laboratory: Gas Chemistry

15. Laboratory: Thermochemistry and Calorimetry

16. Laboratory: Electrochemistry

17. Laboratory: Photochemistry

18. Laboratory: Colloids and Suspensions

19. Laboratory: Qualitative Analysis

20. Laboratory: Quantitative Analysis

21. Laboratory: Synthesis of Useful Compounds

22. Laboratory: Forensic Chemistry

Link

Taxonomy upgrade extras: 

Why Juicycampus.com, Rottenneighbor.com, and gossip sites could be a good thing for free speech

Recently I got a call from a reporter at the local ABC affiliate in San Diego to interview for a story about juicycampus.com. The questions hinted that the story the reporter was looking for was one of how awful and hurtful some of the anonymous posts on the site are for students. I spent 30 minutes telling the reporter what I thought, particularly how similar, at least from a free speech perspective, gossip sites like juicycampus.com are to more widely accepted sites, such as wikipedia, craigslist, and wikilinks, which also allow anonymous posting, editing, or comments.

The resulting story was a disappointment, noticeably lacking any mention of free speech. While this was not unexpected, I figured I'd share my thoughts, and a bit of dismay for the old media, here in the new media world. It is true that sites like juicycampus and rottenneighbor receive protection from liability for defamation and other claims under section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (excluding some claims like IP).

The ABC report suggested that these gossip sites are harmful and deserve to be held liable for defamation by third parties that appears on their websites. While section 230 may not have been crafted to protect juicycampus.com, it has been a critical piece law protecting all websites from liability for defamation by third parties. The protection allows sites to serve as open, public forums for communication. It wasn't that long ago that craigslist only had 12 employees, yet received over 1,000,000 posts a day. The growth of sites like craigslist could be stifled if liability were too broad.

As far as anonymity, it is still true that if an individual posts defamation on any of these websites, they are liable, and, with some effort, posters can often be discovered. That said, sites like wikileaks and wikipedia have proven the value of anonymous contribution. Wikileaks and other sites serve as whistleblower forums, providing a place where concerned employees and citizens can go to tell their story without fear of retribution from corporations or governments. Certainly the need for such sites couldn't be greater felt than in the developing world, where being allowed to speak anonymously without retribution is often the only possibility for the truth. Wikileaks is known for the influence some posts on its site had on the recent Kenyan elections.

Perhaps stating that the needs of citizens in developing nation dictatorships outweigh the harm from learning who the fattest, sluttiest, or jockiest person in school is an oversimplification. But it really is a balancing act.

In the end, people who post defamation are still guilty of defamation, albeit a bit hard to track down. For those under 18, schools and parents can encourage policies and codes of conduct that restrict and students use of gossip and even social networking sites.

The sites themselves, however, should be given protection and allowed to flourish as bastions of open and free communication. Some will be loved by many, ie wikipedia, craigslist. Others may be disliked by large numbers of people, such as gossip sites, racist sites, political minority sites, etc. The question is, can one really exist without the other?

Hearing stories of college students requesting public forum websites be banned from access on their campus, as apparently happened at Pepperdine University with juicycampus.com, makes me recoil in horror.

Any thought of curbing immunity for public forum websites deserves a well reasoned and cautious approach.

Find additional articles by

Related Topics: 

Related Types of Content: 

Additional Tags: 

Genetically distinct photoshop fetish discovered


Every time I think I've seen it all on the internet, someone informs me that I have not. Evidently, there is some population of folks online who take visceral delight in gazing upon poorly-photoshopped images of pinups being squished alive by pythons or elephant trunks. NSFW, some include hand-drawn bodily fluids being squeezed from helpless modelbodies. The only thing that could make this crude cropping any sexier is a li'l drop shadow and some emboss. Mmmmm. Link. (thanks, Reverse Cowgirl)

Taxonomy upgrade extras: 

Today on Boing Boing Gadgets

bawls_3up.jpgToday on Boing Boing Gadgets Rob sipped a new variety of Bawls that is root beer-flavored; we spied a concept ring that heats up once a year to remind you of anniversaries; gave the Sony VAIO TZ subnotebook a review, crapware and all; found a long-term review of the SPOT Satellite Messenger emergency beacon; admonished you about the tiny treasures found in our Flickr groups; uncovered a plastic helmet for baseball caps; questioned HP's hazy connection between its new workstations and DreamWorks; pondered some glow-in-the-dark wallpaper; tried to help Rob boost his Wi-Fi while he thought about taxes; considered how long it might take for a company selling Hackintoshes to get crushed under Apple's heel (apparently, not long, as their site is kaput); bowed our head and accepted our fate as servents of a tabletop kaiju miniatures game; discovered the diminutive son of a nose hair trimmer and a pepper mill; found an easy way for you to waste fifty large on skewered junker cars; pined for a motorized, remote-control paintball turret for our very own; looked at Jeff Atwood's numbers on extending laptop battery life (no DVDs, soldier!); simultaneously lusted after the new Sharp/Willcom D4 UMPC while wondering which engineer from Psion was sacrificed on a windy, Japanese mountaintop; discovered that sticking a tube of radium in your eye isn't as harmful as it may at first seem; and noticed that Hasbro has finally seen the light and will be issuing an updated, action-figure-scale version of that old favorite, the big ol' Millenium Falcon. Then some deals and retro links (including insect/bunny men hybrids?)

Taxonomy upgrade extras: 

Pages